Search for: "Denise L Cote" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Jon Brodkin
Apple The US Department of Justice has won its antitrust case against Apple, with District Judge Denise Cote today ruling that "Apple conspired to restrain trade" by leading a conspiracy to raise e-book prices above the low prices charged by Amazon. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Friday's decision by Judge Denise Cote (S.D.N.Y.) in Farrakhan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:45 am by Jon Brodkin
Seattle Clouds Earlier today, Apple lost a major case when District Judge Denise Cote ruled that the company led a conspiracy to raise e-book prices above those charged by Amazon. [read post]
17 Jun 2005, 2:55 pm
Presbyterian Church of Sudan (plus other parties), by Southern District of NY judge Denise Cote. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:28 pm by Joe Mullin
US District Judge Denise Cote rejected his arguments this morning in a 6-page order (PDF), noting that Wasserbauer was in fact asking for a "gag order," something that had raised serious constitutional issues. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:00 pm
  Judge Lynch's colleague on the Southern District, the Honorable Denise L. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Jon Brodkin
But in District Court Judge Denise Cote's final judgment released yesterday (PDF), the DOJ didn't get everything it wanted. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 3:35 am by Alfred Brophy
Chamberlain Professor of LegislationRobert Scott, co-chair, Alfred McCormack Professor of LawPatrick Bolton, Barbara and David Zalaznick Professor of Business, Columbia Business SchoolThe Honorable Denise Cote GSAS ’69, LAW ’75, United States District JudgeBrett Dignam, Clinical Professor of LawSuzanne Goldberg, Herbert and Doris Wechsler Clinical Professor of LawSarah Green ’14, student, Columbia Law SchoolNkonye… [read post]
Southern District of New York Judge Denise Cote imposed the monetary sanction on attorney Richard L. pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules and the court’s inherent authority to manage its own affairs (Paul Steeger v. [read post]